Attorney Comments On Neil Rockind’s Cross Examination Of A Police Officer In Trial – Calls It “Classic”

UPDATE: the trial at issue resulted in an acquittal for our client:  he was acquitted of all charges, including Aggravated Assault and Assault and Battery.   Here are pictures of the complainant so that the reader can appreciate what we were up against: In a hotly contested Aggravated Assault trial presently underway, veteran trial attorney […]

A Study About Cross Examination – Cross Can Impact Jurors

How do leading cross-examination questions influence jurors’ perceptions of experts? Because of the nearly unrestricted use of leading questions, cross-examination provides opportunity to influence jurors through questions designed to impart information to the jury. Kassin and colleagues (1990) tested whether jurors’ perceptions of an expert witness can be influenced by leading cross-examination questions. Jurors heard […]

Anticipating A Witness’s Testimony And The Setup Of A Witness’ Testimony Where Physical Evidence Or Logic Contradict The Witness’ Testimony | Killer Cross Examination

A key component of a killer cross examination is to identify and isolate moments where a witness testifies to a fact that is contradicted by physical evidence, photographs and/or common sense and logic.  While some lawyers choose to cross examine a witness without regard to the witness’ testimony (yes, there are several lawyers who actually […]

Using Real Time “In The Moment” And Common Sense – Critical Elements Of A Killer Cross Examination

Neil Rockind, author of killercrossexamination.com, shares tips and real world examples of cross examinations to help lawyers develop a Killer Cross Examination | Using Real Time Many trial teachers and instructors teach students to be “in the moment” yet having watched many of the lawyers who were educated in this fashion ply their trade, I […]